<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Associated Chaffey Teachers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress</link>
	<description>337 N. Vineyard Ave  Ontario, CA 91764  (909) 390-5534</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tentative Agreement by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/2009/04/20/tentative-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/?p=244#comment-377</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t we been saying we want the budget cuts to stay as far away from students as possible?  Well, do we think increasing class size helps them?   How far are we willing to go when it comes to class size in order to keep our pay untouchable?  190? 200?  Who finally says enough is enough, students deserve better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t we been saying we want the budget cuts to stay as far away from students as possible?  Well, do we think increasing class size helps them?   How far are we willing to go when it comes to class size in order to keep our pay untouchable?  190? 200?  Who finally says enough is enough, students deserve better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tentative Agreement by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/2009/04/20/tentative-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/?p=244#comment-375</guid>
		<description>You are CTA and what are you doing to help the cause.
The only thing I heard from you is what is CTA doing.
You are CTA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are CTA and what are you doing to help the cause.<br />
The only thing I heard from you is what is CTA doing.<br />
You are CTA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tentative Agreement by pamela nagler</title>
		<link>http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/2009/04/20/tentative-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-374</link>
		<dc:creator>pamela nagler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/?p=244#comment-374</guid>
		<description>Raising our class load to 180 is discouraging in the least.

Many of my colleagues think that teaching in the arts is one of the better jobs at a comprehensive high school - and maybe these jobs are.  I know that I was raised to believe that teaching arts to kids is a privilege.  However, let&#039;s look at the real picture, factoring in how increasing class size is making it harder and harder to&#039; deliver the promise.&#039;

In the 13 years I have been teaching at Montclair High, 17 art teachers have left - which constitutes a 3x turnover rate.  A few were legitimate retirees (albeit early or unexpected due to health), but most were non-reelects or teachers transferring to other positions both inside and outside of the District.  These figures should raise questions about the sustainability of these jobs.

And so - where do we go from here?  We obviously need more funding from the state to keep salaries and class size at sustainable levels.  That means we need more taxpayer, grassroots support.  For the $2000 a year my husband and I contribute to CTA, I am expecting a better campaign from both CTA and State Superintendent O&#039;Connell.

First off, CTA needs to revamp its advertising style in order to maximize our advertising budget.  At least some of our advertising dollar should be paperless - highly effective, less expensive in the long run, and better for the environment.  Mailings are still important, but could be scaled back considerably - not so often and so lavish. (tri-fold, super-glossy, etc.)   Recently, CTA sent a fancy mailing which included an expensive, one-time use, display-in-the-car-window flier for Pink Friday, and I did not see anyone using it.

Secondly, I am convinced that we need to change the tone of our campaigns - we need to start running less reactive, more positive campaigns if we want to garner the support of the public.  We should use our campaign dollars to talk about all of the great things we do in public schools, how our standards are some of the best in the nation, and that all that we do is &#039;against the odds&#039; when our class size is the largest in the nation.   

We need some cheerleaders - CTA and O&#039;Connell should be leading the charge.  Every message that they put out should have lots of positives - promoting the fact that we have some of the best teachers in the country, that our &#039;think tanks&#039; who help develop curriculum standards are the best in the country, that our educational system is the cornerstone for a democratic and free society.  With all the negatives about public schools that we are hearing from the press and the politicians we need to reassure the public in these hard economic times that spending money on education is the best way that taxpayers can invest their money.  People are worried and scared, and they think our schools are failing - and who wants to fund a failing effort?  We have to change it around, and convince people that we are succeeding in spite of the obstacles.  America loves the underdog - give people and opportunity to root for us and all we do in the classroom.

Can you pass these comments on to CTA ?  And explain how I can do so?  I need help figuring out how to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raising our class load to 180 is discouraging in the least.</p>
<p>Many of my colleagues think that teaching in the arts is one of the better jobs at a comprehensive high school &#8211; and maybe these jobs are.  I know that I was raised to believe that teaching arts to kids is a privilege.  However, let&#8217;s look at the real picture, factoring in how increasing class size is making it harder and harder to&#8217; deliver the promise.&#8217;</p>
<p>In the 13 years I have been teaching at Montclair High, 17 art teachers have left &#8211; which constitutes a 3x turnover rate.  A few were legitimate retirees (albeit early or unexpected due to health), but most were non-reelects or teachers transferring to other positions both inside and outside of the District.  These figures should raise questions about the sustainability of these jobs.</p>
<p>And so &#8211; where do we go from here?  We obviously need more funding from the state to keep salaries and class size at sustainable levels.  That means we need more taxpayer, grassroots support.  For the $2000 a year my husband and I contribute to CTA, I am expecting a better campaign from both CTA and State Superintendent O&#8217;Connell.</p>
<p>First off, CTA needs to revamp its advertising style in order to maximize our advertising budget.  At least some of our advertising dollar should be paperless &#8211; highly effective, less expensive in the long run, and better for the environment.  Mailings are still important, but could be scaled back considerably &#8211; not so often and so lavish. (tri-fold, super-glossy, etc.)   Recently, CTA sent a fancy mailing which included an expensive, one-time use, display-in-the-car-window flier for Pink Friday, and I did not see anyone using it.</p>
<p>Secondly, I am convinced that we need to change the tone of our campaigns &#8211; we need to start running less reactive, more positive campaigns if we want to garner the support of the public.  We should use our campaign dollars to talk about all of the great things we do in public schools, how our standards are some of the best in the nation, and that all that we do is &#8216;against the odds&#8217; when our class size is the largest in the nation.   </p>
<p>We need some cheerleaders &#8211; CTA and O&#8217;Connell should be leading the charge.  Every message that they put out should have lots of positives &#8211; promoting the fact that we have some of the best teachers in the country, that our &#8216;think tanks&#8217; who help develop curriculum standards are the best in the country, that our educational system is the cornerstone for a democratic and free society.  With all the negatives about public schools that we are hearing from the press and the politicians we need to reassure the public in these hard economic times that spending money on education is the best way that taxpayers can invest their money.  People are worried and scared, and they think our schools are failing &#8211; and who wants to fund a failing effort?  We have to change it around, and convince people that we are succeeding in spite of the obstacles.  America loves the underdog &#8211; give people and opportunity to root for us and all we do in the classroom.</p>
<p>Can you pass these comments on to CTA ?  And explain how I can do so?  I need help figuring out how to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tentative Agreement by Don't raise class size!</title>
		<link>http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/2009/04/20/tentative-agreement/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Don't raise class size!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/?p=244#comment-373</guid>
		<description>The class size raise is a bad idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The class size raise is a bad idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bargaining Update by Hank Mollet</title>
		<link>http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/2009/04/10/bargaining-update-4/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Mollet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/?p=235#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Class size is tied so closely to funding that our mantra has not really changed.  Without appropriate funding, districts cannot afford to give the salaries we deserve and hire enough teachers at those salaries to lower class sizes.  You are right, we need the legislators and public to support appropriate funding for education.  Keep the message alive until they budget enough money to pay for the salaries our teachers deserve and the class sizes that will help our students be more successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Class size is tied so closely to funding that our mantra has not really changed.  Without appropriate funding, districts cannot afford to give the salaries we deserve and hire enough teachers at those salaries to lower class sizes.  You are right, we need the legislators and public to support appropriate funding for education.  Keep the message alive until they budget enough money to pay for the salaries our teachers deserve and the class sizes that will help our students be more successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bargaining Update by Pamela Nagler</title>
		<link>http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/2009/04/10/bargaining-update-4/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Nagler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 20:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/?p=235#comment-369</guid>
		<description>As a union, we need to get the facts out to our legislators, our judicial system, and our public what you just told me - that we are dead last in terms of class size.

The union is called to lobby on so many different issues - at this point in time. I think we  need to focus on just this one crucial issue because so much cause and effect is attached to it.  The union  needs to state and restate this in every way possible, and we need to follow up and substantiate for the public what so many of us think: CLASS SIZE MATTERS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a union, we need to get the facts out to our legislators, our judicial system, and our public what you just told me &#8211; that we are dead last in terms of class size.</p>
<p>The union is called to lobby on so many different issues &#8211; at this point in time. I think we  need to focus on just this one crucial issue because so much cause and effect is attached to it.  The union  needs to state and restate this in every way possible, and we need to follow up and substantiate for the public what so many of us think: CLASS SIZE MATTERS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bargaining Update by Don't raise class size!</title>
		<link>http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/2009/04/10/bargaining-update-4/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Don't raise class size!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/?p=235#comment-368</guid>
		<description>I agree that we should not raise class size. I especially hate to see that it is the first option listed. It is a disservice to the students and sets up the classroom to be more about crowd control than about quality learning. It should be a last resort. 

Firing teachers and squeezing more students into the rooms of the teachers that remain is not the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that we should not raise class size. I especially hate to see that it is the first option listed. It is a disservice to the students and sets up the classroom to be more about crowd control than about quality learning. It should be a last resort. </p>
<p>Firing teachers and squeezing more students into the rooms of the teachers that remain is not the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bargaining Update by Jan</title>
		<link>http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/2009/04/10/bargaining-update-4/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/?p=235#comment-367</guid>
		<description>And still our survey results tell us that, overwhelmingly, when faced with choosing between salary and caseload, teachers choose salary so they can continue living in the Golden State. The travesty is that this is a choice  we must make over and over because California funds public schools at 46th or 47th in the nation. As a state, California is dead last when it comes to class size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And still our survey results tell us that, overwhelmingly, when faced with choosing between salary and caseload, teachers choose salary so they can continue living in the Golden State. The travesty is that this is a choice  we must make over and over because California funds public schools at 46th or 47th in the nation. As a state, California is dead last when it comes to class size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bargaining Update by Pamela Nagler</title>
		<link>http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/2009/04/10/bargaining-update-4/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Nagler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/?p=235#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Increasing class size is the wrong way to go.  We&#039;ve been boiling the frog slowly for so long that we are not even noticing that the water is dangerously screaming hot .  

I found a roll sheet from the late 80s underneath a drawer in my ancient desk here at school, and the math teacher was teaching about 145 students a day - 35 less than what this union is starting with as a figure to negotiate from.  So a teacher in the late 80s taught essentially one less class of students in his/her 5 period day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Increasing class size is the wrong way to go.  We&#8217;ve been boiling the frog slowly for so long that we are not even noticing that the water is dangerously screaming hot .  </p>
<p>I found a roll sheet from the late 80s underneath a drawer in my ancient desk here at school, and the math teacher was teaching about 145 students a day &#8211; 35 less than what this union is starting with as a figure to negotiate from.  So a teacher in the late 80s taught essentially one less class of students in his/her 5 period day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on REOPENERS 2009-10 by Jan</title>
		<link>http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/2009/03/09/reopeners-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chaffeyteachers.org/wordpress/?p=209#comment-362</guid>
		<description>You could ask the AP of facilities to post the facilities usage calendar on the school website, if it is not there already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could ask the AP of facilities to post the facilities usage calendar on the school website, if it is not there already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

